* AK Press – Spunk: EcoFascism: Lessons from the German Experience by Janet Biehl and Peter Staudenmaier: Introduction [SQ Copy]; Fascist Ideology: The Green Wing of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents [SQ Copy]; Ecology and the Modernization of Fascism in the German Ultra-Right [SQ Copy], Bibliographic and Publication Information [SQ Copy].
Janet Biehl, Peter Staudenmaier, Spunk, 01 Jan 2011
For most compassionate and humane people today, the ecological crisis is a source of major concern. Not only do many ecological activists struggle to eliminate toxic wastes, to preserve tropical rainforests and old-growth redwoods, and to roll back the destruction of the biosphere, but many ordinary people in all walks of life are intensely concerned about the nature of the planet that their children will grow up to inhabit. In Europe as in the United States, most ecological activists think of themselves as socially progressive. That is, they also support demands of oppressed peoples for social justice and believe that the needs of human beings living in poverty, illness, warfare, and famine also require our most serious attention.
For many such people, it may come as a surprise to learn that the history of ecological politics has not always been inherently and necessarily progressive and benign. In fact, ecological ideas have a history of being distorted and placed in the service of highly regressive ends–even of fascism itself. As Peter Staudenmaier shows in the first essay in this pamphlet, important tendencies in German “ecologism,” which has long roots in nineteenth-century nature mysticism, fed into the rise of Nazism in the twentieth century. During the Third Reich, Staudenmaier goes on to show, Nazi “ecologists” even made organic farming, vegetarianism, nature worship, and related themes into key elements not only in their ideology but in their governmental policies. Moreover, Nazi “ecological” ideology was used to justify the destruction of European Jewry. Yet some of the themes that Nazi ideologists articulated bear an uncomfortably close resemblance to themes familiar to ecologically concerned people today.
As social ecologists, it is not our intention to deprecate the all-important efforts that environmentalists and ecologists are making to rescue the biosphere from destruction. Quite to the contrary: It is our deepest concern to preserve the integrity of serious ecological movements from ugly reactionary tendencies that seek to exploit the widespread popular concern about ecological problems for regressive agendas. But we find that the “ecological scene” of our time–with its growing mysticism and antihumanism–poses serious problems about the direction in which the ecology movement will go.
In most Western nations in the late twentieth century, expressions of racism and anti-immigrant sentiments are not only increasingly voiced but increasingly tolerated. Equally disconcertingly, fascist ideologists and political groups are experiencing a resurgence as well. Updating their ideology and speaking the new language of ecology, these movements are once again invoking ecological themes to serve social reaction. In ways that sometimes approximate beliefs of progressive-minded ecologists, these reactionary and outright fascist ecologists emphasize the supremacy of the “Earth” over people; evoke “feelings” and intuition at the expense of reason; and uphold a crude sociobiologistic and even Malthusian biologism. Tenets of “New Age” eco-ideology that seem benign to most people in England and the United States–specifically, its mystical and antirational strains–are being intertwined with ecofascism in Germany today. Janet Biehl’s essay explores this hijacking of ecology for racist, nationalistic, and fascist ends.
Taken together, these essays examine aspects of German fascism, past and present, in order to draw lessons from them for ecology movements both in Germany and elsewhere. Despite its singularities, the German experience offers a clear warning against the misuse of ecology, in a world that seems ever more willing to tolerate movements and ideologies once regarded as despicable and obsolete. Political ecology thinkers have yet to fully examine the political implications of these ideas in the English-speaking world as well as in Germany.
What prevents ecological politics from yielding reaction or fascism with an ecological patina is an ecology movement that maintains a broad social emphasis, one that places the ecological crisis in a social context. As social ecologists, we see the roots of the present ecological crisis in an irrational society–not in the biological makeup of human beings, nor in a particular religion, nor in reason, science, or technology. On the contrary, we uphold the importance of reason, science, and technology in creating both a progressive ecological movement and an ecological society. It is a specific set of social relations–above all, the competitive market economy–that is presently destroying the biosphere. Mysticism and biologism, at the very least, deflect public attention away from such social causes. In presenting these essays, we are trying to preserve the all-important progressive and emancipatory implications of ecological politics. More than ever, an ecological commitment requires people today to avoid repeating the errors of the past, lest the ecology movement become absorbed in the mystical and antihumanistic trends that abound today.
Lessons from the German Experience
Janet Biehl and Peter Staudenmaier
© Copyright: 1995 Janet Biehl and Peter Staudenmaier
Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
Biehl, Janet, 1953–
Ecofascism: lessons from the German experience / by Janet
Biehl and Peter Staudenmaier
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 1-873176 73 2 (paper)
1. Green movement–Germany–History–20th century. 2. Fascism– Germany.
3. Environmental policy–Germany. 4. Environmentalism. 5. Political
policy–Germany–History. 6. Right and left (Political science)
7. Grünen (Political party)
I. Staudenmaier, Peter, 1965– .
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library.
First published in 1995 by
AK Press AK Press
22 Lutton Place P.O. Box 40682
Edinburgh, Scotland San Francisco, CA
EH8 9PE 94140-0682
Typeset and design donated by Freddie Baer.
Web edition donated by Chuck Munson